A New Cohesive theory of everything.
Copresumy, the true force in the cosmos, that of Dark Matter.
Introduction.
On
How would it be though if
Newton
is famously described as observing an apple to fall to the ground in his
orchard. He correctly reasoned that that there must be a force acting upon it.
He discarded the ideas of Descartes
and Huygens, and proposed
a force of attraction between all objects, proportional to their mass, acting
at a distance. There was a straight choice as to whether the apple was pulled
by the earth or pushed from space by the ether. For three hundred years
Even Newton’s basic idea - that of an invisible attractive
force, acting upon the planets, was not entirely his own, and was
simultaneously proposed by Robert Hooke, but Newton took the idea further and
applied it to all objects , large and small, and gained credence by describing
the forces mathematically. Mathematics are descriptive and hold to this day in
calculating the planetary orbits as accurately as possible. The mathematics are
not perfect though, and continuous correction from observation is required.
Nevertheless, no-one has ever bettered
The Paradox
A theory involving dark matter, the ether of the ancients is now the only way forward in the face of so many new findings that cannot be explained by action at a distance or the attraction of matter.
If “gravity” were to exist so as to hold the earth in orbit around the sun, then weightlessness could not exist in the void of space. There would be a gravitational gradient from the earth to the sun, and bodies in space would move towards one or the other with unfailing speed. We now know for certain that zero gravity exists only five miles above the earth’s surface. Therefore gravity in space as an attractive force between masses does not exist at all.
Comets and planets do not travel in circular orbits as would have to be the case if they were constrained by a carefully balanced attractive force. They move in irregular elliptical orbits, and wobble quite a lot. Any movement of the earth nearer to the sun from a position of perfect balance would inevitably lead to the earth and sun coming together very quickly indeed. Laplace and Lagrange showed how planetary orbits varied over long periods, returning to their previous orbital paths.
Comets can travel quite close to the sun, and the lightest particles, in their tails, are not attracted by the sun, but are directed away from the sun. (Hooke) An object circling the sun, thought to be a new comet, was reported in 1996.
The tides of the sea, circle the earth not once a day, as they would if attracted by a gravitational force from the moon and sun, but twice a day, as can only be explained with an alternative hypothesis. The sea and the atmosphere.
Objects fall to earth at the same speed, irrespective of their mass.
Inertia is not satisfactorily explained by universal gravitation.
Oceans have been found from satellite mapping, to be depressed in the central deeper parts (the opposite of attraction by the gravity of the sun). Diagrams.
The lift of a wing can be increased in air by increased curvature over the upper surface, this has never been explained.
Pluto and its moon, circle each other as well as the sun. All remain in stable orbit never attracted to the planet or the sun!
The sun’s corona is formed of the lightest particles, and these are thrown thousands of miles into space, from within a body of apparently massive gravity.
If gravity existed in the mass of a planet, then the light molecules of gas in the atmosphere would all be attracted onto the surface, and gas could not exist.
The planet Uranus, has rings of dust that remain suspended permanently, along with its moon. This all suspended in space at the most massive distance from the sun. The dust and the moon (Miranda) have the same ability to remain in permanent orbit. Jupiter also has faint rings of dust thousands of miles across that never coalesce, despite all the particles having an “attractive” gravitational force. Promethius and Pandora, two tiny moons of Saturn, have been straying.
If a spacecraft were influenced by gravity from afar, not
only would it continuously speed up, but it
would be dragged toward the centre of any planetary body, and it would not be possible to achieve a trajectory that
would produce an orbit.
If gravity were to exist
upon the earth, then that force must necessarily become less and less toward
the centre of the earth, since at the centre of any body, all the mass is
outside of the centre. Therefore gravitational pull will force the body out
from the centre toward a point of equilibrium. This does not happen, and the
pressure upon a body become greater and greater as the centre is approached.
Clearly then the force that exists
presses towards the centre , and is
not a pull from outside.
The transmission of light
without diminution over millions of miles in every direction is clearly
impossible if the particle actually travels, since the particle cannot travel
in all directions at once. For the light to be passed in such a way the space
must be fully occupied by the particles which transmit the light from one to
the next, outward from the centre as a ripple or vibration, which can travel
almost indefinitely since the particles that vibrate are virtually massles.
Even then over millions of light years the waveform will deteriorate, causing a
lengthening of the wave, or red shift, a function of the very small mass of the
particles of the “dark” matter.
In France the ideas of Descartes and Huygens held sway after Newton for another hundred years or so. Then Einstein seized upon the ideas of Poincaré and ignored those of Maxwell and Fresnel. He would never have been believed except that he predicted the effect of the eclipse upon the starlight, but gave the wrong explanation. Thereafter his most wacky ideas were lapped up although they could not be explained or verified. Many scientists since pretended to understand them, and came up with even more esoteric theories, which will not stand the test of time.
Huygens, Thomas Young and then Doppler showed the waveform of light. This waveform propagates in all directions without apparent diminution in all directions like a ripple in a pond, whereas particulate energy travelling outwards from a single point in space for even a mile, would be so dissipated as to disappear entirely. Imagine a point in the centre of a balloon, being translated into the same point size on the whole of the surface of that balloon. The multiple of the particle to produce the same particulate energy at that surface would be a factor of many millions, even within a few inches.
Newton’s action at a distance was in doubt. Maxwell and Faraday, Faraday and Hertz proposed other forms of radiation that could only be propagated through an ether. The Mitchelson-Morley experiments showed the constant speed of light though the ether, if the ether moves with the planets around the sun, then even allowing for experimental limitations, their experiments prove the existence of the ether, not the absence of it. Lorenz had postulated that light was electromagnetic transmission by particle. Poincaré expounded a theory of relativity in 1905, and Einstein his own theory in 1906.
The discovery in 1965 of the cosmic microwave background, an all pervading radiation thoughout the Universe, polarised, thought to have last interacted with matter 14 billion years ago, shows matter to be evenly spread throughout space.
Einstein’s theory considered motion, and ignored gravity and
acceleration. He postulated particles and waves for the transmission of light,
but argued that space and time were equivalent, and that mass and energy were
equivalent in the most unprovable of all equations,
M=EC2
In 2003, two researchers claimed to have measured the speed of gravity.
Einstein had apparently shown that time was a dimension. This is not so and can be disproved. If time is not an independent variable, then
space-time is not as Einstein postulated, and relativity theory does not hold
true.
A simple time experiment.
If time is truly independent of events, then time can be applied to events and cause them to vary. If we look at an event that happens with absolute regularity, and can show that it can be altered in any way by the application of time as an independent force or dimension, then time truly has that effect. If we can apply time in a simple manner to a regular but random event, and see a difference, then Einstein may be right. The alternative is simply that time is only a construct of the rate of change as measured by the revolution of the earth around the sun, or by an atomic clock.
Take the movement of a pendulum in a room. If it were to move slowly, would it be possible to move in and out of the room at will and see only the forward movement of the pendulum, and not the backward movement? If the pendulum moves as predicted, its movement can be foreseen by timing it, and it will be possible to see all the forward strokes and none of the backstrokes. This would not be a manipulation of events by time. If however we flip a coin and record how many times it falls as “heads”, and how many are “tails”, then overall, as we all know, the number of each is absolutely equal with the passage of time. Indeed try this yourself and the longer you go on the more even it becomes, there can be a variance up to about a factor of ten, but there is a true oscillation about the mean, and as time progresses, the result is always even. If however we suppose that time is truly a variable, then it can be applied to this process. If the coin is flipped once, it may come down heads. If it comes down tails first, then maybe it will come down heads next. If therefore we flip the coin until we have scored an excess of one occurrence of heads over tails, then we have applied time to the process. If then we go away and come back another day, whilst the process of flipping the coin or rotating a roulette wheel for example, continues, then we should be able to start from a random beginning, and again proceed until there is an excess of one “head”. If overall this process can be continued indefinitely, then time as an independent variable, will be shown to exist. This is much more practical than attempting to exceed the speed of light. When however it is continued over many days and months at random, it always eventually returns to zero, equality.
Time is a measure of what happens and the speed at which a process happens. It is not independent of the process.
Light is the propagation of a wave from one quark or (virtually) massless particle to another at a finite and measurable speed. It has to be measured in time, it cannot be changed by the application of time as a dimension, and is not altered by flying around the universe at infinite speed, or by coming in and out of the time experiment at different moments.
The History of “gravity”.
Socrates, Plato and Aristotle laid the foundations of science and philosophy in the 5th and 4th centuries BC.
Eudoxus and Heracleides added to Plato’s theory.
Aristotle proposed a theory of matter.
In 300BC. Euclid laid the foundations of geometry, and Archimedes (287-212 BC) theorised on floating bodies.
Ptolemy (127-145) first catalogued the stars and argued the geocentric system.
Copernicus produced his paper on the motion of the heavenly bodies ( the heliocentric system) in 1514.
Bruno (1547-1600) published a treatise on the workings of the universe, based on the Copernican system, in 1583.
Tycho Brahe (1546- 1601) plotted the positions of the stars, but proposed a system of a fixed earth with the planets revolving around the sun.
Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) believed in a divine plan. He realised that mars could not be orbiting the earth, that the planets move in ellipses, and sweep out equal areas in equal time. He also laid the foundation of Newton’s inverse square law with his third law of the period of revolution of a planet.
Leonardo Da Vinci (1452-1519) followed by Benedetti and Stevin (1548-1620), experimented with falling bodies.
Rene Descartes (1596-1650), built a theory of the nature of man and the universe. He described the motion of a body in time and mathematical terms, using algebra for the first time, and described a universe full of infinitely divisible matter, set in motion by God. He conceived of inertia, proposed that the earth does not move relative to the material it is within, and formulated two laws of motion. For a philosopher as obsessed with mechanism as Rene Descartes, the relationship between see able machines and the unseen machinery of God’s cosmos was a matter of the greatest moment.
Gallileo Gallilei (1564-1642), applied mathematics to pendulums, the free fall of bodies, projectiles, and acceleration. He conceived of inertia, refined the telescope, and observing the movement of sunspots, showed the rotation of the sun. He also observed the librations of the moon, but believed that the orbits of the planets must be circular.
Isaac Newton (1643- 1727),first experimented with light and attempted to reproduce the work of Descartes.
Christiaan Huygens (1629-1695) developed Descartes ideas of matter and after improving the telescope, saw Saturn’s rings. He analysed the movement of a pendulum, defined inertia, and proposed a theory of gravitation based upon Descartes vortices.
Newton developed a method of calculus, and a theory of universal gravitation. He applied the inverse square law to planetary and cometal movements. He decided that if there was an ether, the movement of planets would be slowed, as would that of a pendulum. He did not consider it possible that the ether might move at the same time, and that only an ether could explain inertia.
Edmund Halley (1656-1742)
made observations of the paths of comets, and encouraged
Liebnitz, who independently devised a calculus, disbelieved the idea of gravitation at a distance.
Lagrange (1736-1813) analysed the moon’s motion (relative to the earth) and showed that at some points there is a stable balance between them. This is hardly surprising if the ether rotates with the two bodies.
Michael Faraday (1791-1867), investigated the nature of electricity and magnetism, and its effect upon light. Energy was to be found in the space between the molecules, in the ether.
James Maxwell (1831-1879) showed that electromagnetic waves moved at the speed of light, and could be explained by an ether.
Albert Michelson (1832-1931) devised an experiment with light to test the presence of ether, but assumed that the ether did not move with the earth, which negated the experiment. (using the Michelson-Morley interferometer)
Hendrik Lorenz (1853-1928) together with Zeeman, constructed a single theory for the transmission of light and electromagnetism
Lorenz and
Henri Poincare then developed a theory of relativity,
published in 1905. Poincare also postulated gravitational waves. Gravitational
waves cannot exist if the ether acts as a true solid, with all incompressible
matter (quarks) being in contact. If they were not in contact they would not
transmit light or electromagnetism. Because they (quarks) are all of very
small, almost negligible mass, they conduct light waves almost indefinitely,
the wave form degrading only slightly after many light years (red shift).
Gravity is transmitted as a constant pressure wave, that has a gradient near to
a body. In proximity to a large body such as a planet, the density of the ether
is increased, producing a displacement and “gravitational” pressure or
confluence, but this is an even pressure, and the waveform is transverse, not
through the ether itself. The change in density of the ether around a planet
will result in refraction of the wave, and apparent lensing, that Einstein
predicted as showing gravity, yet he said that gravity did not exist, and that
this lensing was due to a curve in space. About 90% of the entire mass of
the milky way is thought to consist of dark matter. The
galaxy is warped, but there is still no concensus as to what produces the
warping. Nebulae are observed to flow.
Albert Einstein (1879-1955) developed his theory of relativity in 1906, following a paper on Brownian motion, and another on the kinetics of heat.
Einstein set out to show that space and time were the same, since the speed of light is constant; also that mass and energy are equivalent. In 1918 he postulated that gravity is not a force, but a feature of space-time resulting from the curvature of space. Einstein’s view was that if one travelled as fast as light, then light would not be observed, but would stand still. It has since been shown that there can be differences in the speed of light.
Black holes have been predicted as a consequence of very dense matter and gravity being so strong as to prevent the emission of light. Clearly another theory would be necessary to explain a black hole if there is no such thing as gravity, and indeed no black hole has ever been demonstrated. Likewise such phenomena as wormholes and time machines are a figment of imagination, and can never be demonstrated. Uncertainty.
That there is indeed an
ether with particles that are in complete contact, can be explained in a simple
analogy. Suppose that there is a line of cars (separate particles) travelling
in a traffic queue. There is then a slowing of any one car to a halt or almost
to a halt. You will find that every succeeding car is forced to come to a halt
also, and further, that when the car that initially slowed, speeds up again, it
moves ahead, yet the cars behind still also come to a halt before the way is
clear and they can speed up again. The only way that this does not happen is if
the cars are all connected together by solid towbars, as though they are a
railway train. Only if the cars or bodies are fixed together can there be a
transmission wave along its length. Thus it can be seen that to transmit a wave
in the ether the particles of the ether must all be in contact and fixed ever
so slightly to each other.
This raises the possibility of structure within the ether.
It is then possible to postulate that human memory and spirit is constructed of
the same ethereal matter, and that there is indeed a world (heaven)outside of the molecular one. Particles. With Quantum
entanglement there seems to be an interlaced structure. The first data
from the Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe have now been released.
(WMAP)
Conclusion
The galaxies are known to move and rotate in space in reaction to the dark matter. That dark matter is composed of almost massless particles, which are packed together and act as a cohesive solid, forcing atoms together into spherical bubbles that float through the ether or circulate in Descartes’ vortex. The ether is denser around the planets so producing a greater displacement force upon a larger body. The transmission of light and other waveforms are radial vibrations of that medium. Refraction of light occurs at an angle to a medium of a different density, and as the density of the ether itself is greater when displaced by a planet or star, then again that light passing close by it is refracted or lensed by the circular body. Time is a measure of events and is invariable except that events and processes can speed up or slow down, nevertheless time is only a marker of any one process proceeding against another. Space appears infinite, and has no discernable margin.
Human spirits and souls can exist in the ether independently of molecular structure. That we take our human experience with us for the future should make us much more fearful of our current behaviour than we are.
GOD was not born in a “big bang”, God’s Universe is INFINITE. It is man who cannot conceive of infinity in time and space and has produced theories to cover up his lack of comprehension. There were only two possibilities for space, either it is infinite or it came from nothing. There were two possibilities for life, either it is a random collection of meaningless molecules, or else everything is created. There were only two possibilities for gravity, it is an attractive force at infinite distance which cannot even be detected, or it is the result of the pressure of the vast quantity of matter that is virtually massless and fills the whole of the universe. Heaven, God and the spirit are safe and well, and have physical structure that he now wishes us to understand.